InfoD-Cafe: Designers' criticisms to the design of experimental material
Paul Stiff
p.stiff at reading.ac.uk
Mon Jun 30 08:23:18 CEST 2008
ah yes ... thanks for completing my sentence
P
incidentally to the topic of this brief thread, I hope that the
current clusters of work on various aspects of Isotype see this; they
might also recall E. Tufte's thinly concealed scorn for Isotype
On 29 Jun 2008, at 23:11, Rob Waller wrote:
> The paper Paul is referring to is Macdonald-Ross M. and Waller RHW
> (1975), 'Criticism, alternatives and tests: A conceptual framework
> for improving typography?', Programmed Learning and Educational
> Technology, vol 12, 75-83. It was part of a special issue on
> typographic research, and urged researchers to respect the tacit
> knowledge of expert designers.
>
> You could also look at pages 193-3 of Waller RHW and Macdonald-Ross
> M (2000), 'The Transformer revisited', (232kb), Information Design
> Journal, vol 9, 177-194.
>
> This includes a description of the experiment published by
> Madeleine Vernon, a leading psychologist of her day, in her popular
> 1963 Pelican book on The Psychology of Perception, in which she
> shows that what she claimed were 'Isotype' charts do not work. But
> the actual chart she tested was a hopelessly amateur version. We
> asked Marie Neurath to redesign it, and our own tests (unpublished)
> found it to work well.
>
> __________________________________
>
> Rob Waller
> Department of Typography & Graphic Communication
> University of Reading
> T +44 (0) 118 378 6411
> M +44 (0) 7850 665933
> r.waller at reading.ac.uk
>
>
> On 26 Jun 2008, at 10:50, Paul Stiff wrote:
>
>> Michael Macdonald-Ross and maybe also Robert Waller ...
>>
>> I may be able to find examples, but can't stop at the moment
>>
>>
>> paul
>>
>>
>> On 26 Jun 2008, at 10:20, Jose de Souza wrote:
>>
>>> Colleagues,
>>>
>>> I need your help once more.
>>>
>>> One of the criticisms made by designers in relation to the
>>> validity of
>>> empirical research comparing "equivalents designs" for a given
>>> information problem
>>> (e.g., visual instructions, diagrams etc.)
>>> is that these designs (experimental material) are per se badly
>>> designed or amateurish.
>>>
>>> Do you know any written example (i.e., paper or book) of such
>>> criticism?
>>> Who are the authors of such criticisms?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> José de Souza
>>> PhD Student
>>> Department of Typography & Graphic Communication
>>> The University of Reading
>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers:
>>> infodesign-cafe at list.informationdesign.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit:
>>> http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe
>>>
>>> For all Information Design matters:
>>> http://InformationDesign.org
>>>
>>> Problems? Write to:
>>> InfoDesign-Cafe-Admin at list.InformationDesign.org
>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers:
>> infodesign-cafe at list.informationdesign.org
>>
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit:
>> http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe
>>
>> For all Information Design matters:
>> http://InformationDesign.org
>>
>> Problems? Write to:
>> InfoDesign-Cafe-Admin at list.InformationDesign.org
>> ___________________________________________________________________
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
> Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers:
> infodesign-cafe at list.informationdesign.org
>
> To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit:
> http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe
>
> For all Information Design matters:
> http://InformationDesign.org
>
> Problems? Write to:
> InfoDesign-Cafe-Admin at list.InformationDesign.org
> ___________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.webtic.nl/pipermail/infodesign-cafe/attachments/20080630/1b54ea70/attachment-0624.htm
More information about the InfoDesign-Cafe
mailing list